cheap shot

She had to ask! From Deborah Bouziden: In one of your books, you killed a dog. You’ve said you would never do it again. Why not?
SW: Yeah, I still feel bad about poor old Gladstone. The reason I wouldn’t do it again is that it’s manipulative. A cheap shot. It’s an amateurish way to wring emotion from the reader and I did it because, well, I was an amateur, a self-taught writer in my twenties. The heroine’s world was being destroyed all around her, and the dog was the metaphor for that, and I wanted the reader to feel sad for her, so I showed the dog being killed. By one of the bad guys, as it happens.
I’m not an amateur anymore. I know better. If I were to do that now, I’d be cheating; it would be lazy writing. A mature writer knows how to plumb the character for genuine emotion.

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email

0 Responses

  1. Growth is good. You were young.. now, you are so much better. The #1 spot on NYT list = the best. Lizzie is half way through Fireside. Loves it! She said – your books are soooo good.

  2. Growth is good. You were young.. now, you are so much better. The #1 spot on NYT list = the best. Lizzie is half way through Fireside. Loves it! She said – your books are soooo good.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay In Touch

Be the first to know all the 
updates from Susan